A program that prepares individuals to apply mathematical and geological principles to the analysis and evaluation of engineering problems, including the geological evaluation of construction sites, the analysis of geological forces acting on structures and systems, the analysis of potential natural resource recovery sites, and applied research on geological phenomena.
|Rank||School Name||Students||% of Total||Total On-Campus Cost|
|1||Missouri University of Science and Technology||196||9%||$21,798|
|2||Colorado School of Mines||84||7%||$30,603|
|3||South Dakota School of Mines and Technology||19||5%||$21,970|
|4||University of Nevada-Reno||15||0%||$22,600|
|5||Montana Tech of the University of Montana||15||4%||$18,724|
|6||Michigan Technological University||11||1%||$26,375|
|7||University of Michigan-Ann Arbor||10||0%||$26,240|
|8||University of Alaska Fairbanks||7||1%||$16,484|
|9||University of Wisconsin-Madison||7||0%||$23,931|
|10||University of Mississippi||7||0%||$22,444|
|11||University of Minnesota-Twin Cities||6||0%||$25,281|
|12||University of California-Los Angeles||4||0%||$32,416|
|13||University of Pennsylvania||3||0%||$61,800|
|14||University of Utah||3||0%||$21,920|
|15||University of Idaho||3||0%||$19,598|
|16||University of Rochester||2||0%||$61,340|
|17||University of North Dakota||1||0%||$21,162|
|18||University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus||1||0%||$23,441|
This list indicates the number of students that completed the Geological/Geophysical Engineering program at the schools above.
It is not necessarily an indicator of academic rigor or quality of education.
Note that some schools do not have enough data to be ranked, and these schools will not appear in our lists.